What are you looking for ?
Advertise with us
RAIDON

Top 10 WW Storage Companies in 2014

EMC leader, but booming Micron not far and now surpassing WD and Seagate

Note: This article was largely corrected on March 10, 2015,  especially following changes on IBM figures.

Growth of global revenue of biggest storage companies continue to increase. For our annual Top 10 it was 5% from 2012 to 2013, 9% from 2013 to 2014. But excluding Without Micron, in different storage activity, the percentage is much lower: 0%. Other giants are competing with a lot of more active smaller firms and mainly start-ups with more innovative storage hardware and software.

EMC continues to be #1 in storage. It’s the case since 2004 but with a tiny growth in 2014 (2% vs. 5% for the former year), It’s a similar trend for rival NetApp at 0% in 2014 and 2% in 2013.

It’s worth for HP (-5%), and more dramatic for IBM (-12%) falling from fifth position in 2012 to the ninth one in 2014.

The only firm doing a good job in storage software and systems is Hitachi with sales up yearly 16% but on a yen basis.

As usually firms offering storage and servers but Hitachi, were once more the big losers from 2013 to 2014 including Dell , IBM  and HP. Note that we couldn’t get the results of Dell not being anymore public but we suspect this company is continuing to struggle in storage.

LSI was at $2.4 billion last year. It was acquired for $6.6 billion by Avago that stated its enterprise storage business represented $867 million in FY14 ended November 2014.

Two hard disk drive companies continue to integrate the top of the list, WD leading in front of Seagate since 2013 and both of them registering lower revenue for FY14. The acquisition of Xyratex by Seagate for $814 million didn’t change its ranking. HDD activity is going to stabilize or even to decline in the future

The firms involved in flash are doing well. SanDisk continues to grow,  7% in 2014. On top of that Micron is  the big winner of the year, booming with global revenue up an impressive 80% in 2014 and consequently getting here the second place of our ranking, not so far from EMC and beating WD and Seagate, even if the business is far to be the same.

Another fast growing firm to follow is SK hynix with global annual revenue at $17.1 billion, a figure higher than EMC, being in NAND flash and in many other activities not at all in storage (computing and graphics memory, CMOS, etc.)

All Top 10 companies below record more than $2 billion in revenue.

Top 10 in Storage Revenue in $ million in FY14
 
Rank 2014 Rank 2013 Rank 2012 FY ending month Vendors 2012 2013 2014 2013/1014 growth
1 1 1 12 EMC * 15,440 16,262 16,542 2%
2 4 4 8 Micron 8,234 9,073 16,358 80%
3 2 3 6 WD 12,478 15,351 15,130 -1%
4 3 2 6 Seagate 14,939 14,351 13,724 -4%
5 6 7 4 SanDisk 5,053 6,170 6,628 7%
6 5 6 4 NetApp 6,233 6,332 6,325 0%
7 8 8 3 HDS + Japan 4,443 3,680 4,260 16%
8 9 9 10 HP * 3,815 3,475 3,315 -5%
9 7 5 12 IBM** 3,411 3,041 2,676 -12%
10 10 11 3 Symantec * 2,412 2,629 2,528 -4%
        TOTAL 76,458 80,364 87,486 9%
 (Compilation by StorageNewsletter.com)
* storage only
**storage products only,  and without Tivoli software

Comments on two Asian companies, Samsung and Toshiba, that could be in Top 10:

  • Samsung, no more directly in HDDs, could merit to be included in the Top 10 but the company does not precisely publish revenue in NAND flash chips and SSDs.
  • It also not easy to get numbers from Toshiba involved in HDDs, SSDs (also with OCZ), flash chips and optical disc drives.

Notes:

  • Here storage is defined as the activity of recording and retrieving computer data using any form of digital devices (based on magnetic, tape, optical, non volatile solid-state – not RAM -, and subsystems) including all associated connectivity, software and services.
  • For this ranking we used the companies’ financial results for their fiscal year 2013 – not the calendar year – ending in any month of 2013. We got official figures – not estimations – for all of them and for storage only.

Historically, here are the winners’ circle since 1991:

   ≠1 ≠2 ≠3
 1991  IBM Adstar
 Seagate  Memorex Telex
 1992  IBM Adstar  Seagate  Conner
 1993  IBM SSD  Seagate  Conner
 1994  IBM SSD  Seagate  Quantum
 1995  Seagate  IBM SSD  Quantum
 1996  Seagate  Quantum  WD
 1997  Seagate  Quantum  Compaq
 1998  Seagate  Quantum  Compaq
 1999  Seagate  EMC  Quantum
 2000  EMC  Seagate  Maxtor
 2001  EMC  Seagate  Maxtor
 2002  Seagate  EMC  Maxtor
 2003  Seagate  EMC  Hitachi GST
 2004  EMC  Seagate  BenQ
 2005  EMC  Seagate  Hitachi GST
 2006  EMC  Seagate  Hitachi GST
 2007  EMC  Seagate  Hitachi GST
 2008  EMC  Seagate  WD
 2009  EMC  Seagate  WD
 2010  EMC  Seagate  WD
 2011  EMC  Seagate  WD
 2012  EMC  Seagate  WD
2013  EMC  WD  Seagate
2014 EMC Micron WD

(Source: StorageNewsletter.com)

 
Articles_bottom
ExaGrid
AIC
ATTOtarget="_blank"
OPEN-E