DR Budgets Higher in 2009 but Flat Over the Next Few Years

Symantec Corp. announced the global results of its fifth annual IT Disaster Recovery survey, which demonstrates rising DR pressures on organizations caused by soaring downtime costs and more stringent IT service level requirements to mitigate risk to the business. The study also shows that while DR budgets are higher in 2009, they are expected to remain flat over the next few years – requiring IT professionals to do more with the same or less.

The survey highlights that while recovery time objectives were reduced to 4 hours in 2009, disaster recovery testing and virtualization are still major challenges for organizations. Respondents report that DR testing increasingly impacts customers and revenue, and one in four tests fail. Nearly a third of organizations don’t test virtual environments as part of their disaster recovery plans, and a slightly larger percentage of virtual environments aren’t regularly backed up — pointing to the need for more automation and cross-environment tools.

Downtime costs are significant
The average cost of executing/implementing disaster recovery plans for each downtime incident worldwide according to respondents is US $287,600. In North America, the median cost can climb to as high as $900,000. Globally, this number is highest for healthcare and financial services organizations. In North America, the median cost for financial institutions is $650,000.

This is alarming when one considers that one in four tests failed and 93 percent of organizations have had to execute on their disaster recovery plans. Respondents reported that it takes on average three hours to achieve skeleton operations after an outage, and four hours to be up and running. This is dramatically improved over the 2008 findings, where only three percent of respondents reported that they could achieve skeleton operations within 12 hours, and 31 percent believed they would have baseline operations within one day.

2009 DR spending bucks trend
The research shows that the annual median budget for disaster recovery initiatives, including backup, recovery, clustering, archiving, spare servers, replication, tape, services, disaster recovery plan development and offsite costs at data centers surveyed is $50 million. According to respondents, this number will continue to grow throughout 2009, but more than half (52 percent) of respondents believe that budgets will be flat in 2010, making it more challenging for IT management to better leverage their assets including hardware, software and personnel.

Executive involvement doubled in past year
According to the 2009 disaster recovery survey, 70 percent of respondents reported that their disaster recovery committees involved the CIO, CTO or IT director – a significant increase from last year’s research where 33 percent of respondents indicated executive involvement. As budgets increased over the past year, disaster recovery initiatives have become more of a competitive differentiator, and impact of downtown on customers is greater than ever. Another reason for executive involvement is the increase of applications that are seen as mission critical. Sixty percent of applications were deemed mission critical by respondents, and nearly the same amount is covered in disaster recovery plans. Any sort of outage to these systems will have an enormous impact to the business.

Disaster recovery testing improves
but still a major challenge
This year, 35 percent of respondents reported that they test their DR plans once per year or less frequently – a 12 percent improvement from last year. In addition, one in four tests still fail, showing a dramatic need for improvement in this area. Reasons most respondents cited for why organizations aren’t testing include:

• Lack of resources in terms of people’s time (48 percent)
• Disruption to employees (44 percent)
• Budget (44 percent)
• Disruption to customers (40 percent)

Also a concern is that more organizations reported that disaster recovery testing increasingly impacts customers and revenue over previous years. Forty percent of respondents reported that disaster recovery testing will impact their organizations’ customers and nearly one third (27 percent) reported that such testing could impact their organization’s sales and revenue. Symantec recommends that organizations implement disaster recovery testing methods that can be run frequently and without disruption to business operations. Symantec believes that people and processes are the main reason tests fail, pointing to the need for more automation.

Virtualization still a major challenge
Sixty-four percent of worldwide respondents reported that virtualization is causing them to reevaluate their disaster recovery plans. This is up from 55 percent in 2008. Still, nearly a third (27 percent) of organizations do not test virtual environments as part of their disaster recovery initiatives. This number has improved in the past year, lowering from more than one-third (35 percent) of organizations who did not test in 2008. Additionally, more than one-third (36 percent) of data on virtualized systems is not regularly backed up, showing no improvement in the past year (37 percent in 2008). Over half of the respondents cited lack of backup storage capacity and automated recovery tools as top challenges to protecting data in virtual environments.

In addition, the study found that globally,
more than half of respondents cited:

• Lack of storage management tools as the top challenge in protecting mission critical data and applications in virtual environments (53 percent)
• Resource constraints such as people, budget, and space as the top challenges to backing up virtual machines suggesting a need for greater automation and the ability to leverage existing IT investments in order to lower costs (51 percent)

Recommendations
As demonstrated over multiple years of this study, lack of resources continues to be an issue, yet the costs of downtime are staggering. Organizations can also do a better job at curbing the costs of downtime by implementing more automation tools that minimize human involvement and address other weaknesses in their disaster recovery plans.

Because disaster recovery testing is invaluable, but can significantly impact business – including customers and revenue – organizations should seek to improve the success of testing by evaluating and implementing testing methods which are non-disruptive.

Finally, organizations should include those responsible for virtualization into disaster recovery plans, especially testing and backup initiatives. Virtual environments should be treated the same as a physical server, showing the need for organizations to adopt more cross-platform and cross-environment tools, or standardizing on fewer platforms.

"This year’s Symantec-sponsored research clearly identifies key issues, hidden risks and best practices in implementing DR. While some aspects are trending well, the impact of downtime is greater than ever before," said Rob Soderbery, senior vice president of Symantec’s Storage and Availability Management Group. "The surging cost of downtime places greater emphasis on business — which means more pressure on IT. If organizations are not protecting virtual environments, not testing their DR plans and seeing one out every four tests fail then something needs to change to better manage risk to the business. Organizations should implement solutions that address these needs while allowing them to leverage existing assets."

About
the 2009 Symantec Disaster Recovery Research Report
In its fifth year, the 2009 Symantec Disaster Recovery Research report is an annual global study commissioned by Symantec to highlight business trends regarding disaster recovery planning and preparedness. Conducted by independent market research firm Applied Research West during June 2009, the study polled more than 1650 IT managers in large organizations across 24 countries in the U.S. and Canada, Europe and the Middle East, Asia Pacific and South America to gain insight and understanding into some of the more complicated factors associated with disaster recovery.

Other resources:
2009 Disaster Recovery Research Report

2009 Disaster Recovery Research Report global press presentation

2009 Disaster Recovery Research Report North America press presentation

2009 Disaster Recovery Research Report EMEA press presentation

2009 Disaster Recovery Research Report Asia Pacific press presentation

Testing your Disaster Recovery Solution

2008 Disaster Recovery Research Report